Industry News, Opinion

Contamination won’t get truck rejected from MRF

I keep reading what, are in my opinion, “waste myths” on-line and in the popular press.

The longest lived and most pervasive is that: “Contamination in a single recycling bin can cause a whole truck load to be rejected and landfilled”. I hear it from people who should know better.

Unless the contaminant is a bomb or equivalent, it is complete porkies.

And don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that contamination is ok. We should actively try to minimise it. However, having run six MRFs, I have never rejected a truck load of recyclables unless it is 30 per cent plus of garbage, or is on fire (that is, about 1.5 tonnes out of a payload of 5 tonnes).

Read more: Veolia awarded City of Gold Coast contract

That is true of all MRFs and MRF operators. The economics would kill the MRF if they did that. It costs a lot more to landfill a load than to process and sell it. Even if it is heavily contaminated (but less than 30 per cent).

Most council contracts with MRFs recognise this and compensate the MRF operator for higher contamination levels.

Furthermore, no single bin and no single resident, makes that much difference.

An average truck holds 500 yellow lid bins worth of recyclables. Even if one bin was 100 per cent contaminated with garbage it would represent about a 0.2 per cent contamination rate of the truck. Not enough to trigger a load rejection.

The average Australian contamination rate of recycling trucks is 12 per cent. One bin is not even a blip.

MRFs are capable and designed to handle contamination. They do a great job of turning yellow bin recyclables into saleable bales of product. “Sows ears into silk purses” so to speak.

Of course, it costs MRFs money to landfill contamination and we should reduce it wherever we can.

But “green-shaming” residents is counterproductive. We need to encourage and not “guilt” residents to do the right thing.

We need to reduce contamination from the average 12 per cent nationally but blaming residents for whole truck loads being rejected is not right, or smart. And it is not correct.

Send this to a friend